The Automatic Backlinks feature currently has no way to filter backlink sources by category or remove a specific backlink. Even with "Relevance" mode enabled, I recently received a backlink from an adult website (eroticcams.best) pointing to my family-friendly car rental / travel site. This kind of adult/NSFW backlink can harm a site's reputation with Google and is completely off-topic. I'd like to request two related controls: Category exclusion — an option to exclude adult, gambling, and other NSFW/spam categories from backlink sources entirely, while keeping Automatic Backlinks enabled. Relevance mode should never place adult-content links on a non-adult site. Remove / disavow a specific backlink — a button to remove or reject an individual unwanted backlink from the dashboard, so I don't have to disavow it through Google Search Console manually. Backlink quality matters as much as quantity for SEO. Being able to keep the feature on while blocking unsafe sources would make Automatic Backlinks far safer and more trustworthy for family-friendly and professional sites.

黃宥榮 6 days ago

1

Summary After resolving a sitemap issue, I've noticed what appears to be a different problem. The Automatic Backlinks feature no longer seems to generate backlinks to the pages listed in my sitemap, despite those pages being substantial, content-rich resources. Current Behaviour The main site is affected https://peterashbysmith.com. I gave Arvow a custom sitemap with only the pages I want to strengthen. These are long-form, evergreen articles that form the core of the site's authority. Despite this, the Automatic Backlinks feature has not generated backlinks to any of these pages since June. Before the sitemap issue was fixed, Arvow readily created backlinks to older blog posts elsewhere on the site. Now that only my preferred pages are available, backlink generation appears to have stopped altogether. Why I Think This May Be a Bug This makes me wonder whether the backlink engine is filtering or overlooking certain types of pages rather than simply following the sitemap. The pages in my sitemap are not thin content. Most are comprehensive articles containing several thousand words of original material and are arguably stronger backlink destinations than many of the older blog posts that previously received links. If these pages are being excluded by the selection algorithm, there may be criteria that are unintentionally preventing high-quality authority pages from being chosen. Questions Could you confirm: Are the pages in my sitemap being successfully crawled and indexed by Arvow? Are they being evaluated as eligible backlink targets? If they are being excluded, what criteria are causing that decision? Why This Matters Many users deliberately concentrate their SEO strategy around evergreen authority pages rather than chronological blog posts. If the backlink engine prefers certain page types or structures, users may be unable to direct authority towards the pages that matter most, even when those pages are explicitly included in their sitemap. Understanding how backlink targets are selected, or identifying a bug if one exists, would make the Automatic Backlinks feature much more predictable and effective.

Peter Ashby Smith 8 days ago

2

Could we get Duda listed on the integrations page? Your AI is telling me that Duda is an integrated option already, but it doesn’t show as an option on the integration pop-up when you click new integration. Could that be done?

Alicia Reagan 10 days ago

It would be great if I could specify URLs in the Sight Optimizer. For example, I have a photography business that has done thousands of posts from photo sessions, which have no real SEO value, just value to the clients and to my portfolio. So I don't what site optimizer to optimize a bunch of worthless pages. I want it to optimize specific pages and articles. I don't want it to just blow through all my credits, hoping it might find a good page to optimize. Thanks for the help.

Steven Hill 15 days ago

3

We used to have this ability in article templates and then on a per article setting. It was originally rolled out over two years ago according to https://arvow.featurebase.app/p/adjust-article-lenght The ability to set the article length was removed in June 2026. I was hoping it could still be set in the “custom instructions”. This disappeared the same time as the context description box. While that did make the articles slightly longer, the length was nowhere as long as either of the two longer options in the past. Charge more credits if needed. While length alone does not help an article be more competitive and too many AI writers will produce fluff to hit a target, Arvow used to do this well, especially with a strong uploaded knowledge base. Now, the articles are thin and likely would struggle even on terms with little competition. The ability to target article length is still in Zimmwriter, Buywords, SurferSEO's writer, and others. Please bring it back.

KurtU 16 days ago

If information is incorrect in a post and you try to have AI edit it. It won't put in different information. It just reformats the same information. I tried to go to the editing box and tell it that the information was incorrect, but it still didn't correct it in the specific paragraph. It just restated the incorrect information in a different way.

Steven Hill 21 days ago

2

Is there a way to import posts as Block editor rather than classic editor? Every time an article posts to my Wordpress it comes in Classic Editor format and when I try to manipulate photos, it won't work. And then the headings don’t come through. I basically have to reformat the entire post. Thanks.

Steven Hill 21 days ago

2

I have 4 sites waiting to be setup - but already not looking forward because its a time consuming process. Could you provide a form- where we can enter our sites — enter in all the basic infor for standard setup and have the system setup these project - all on the spot - then later for polishing -individual customizations can be done per project. Such would be a great time saver and boy…..thats what we all need. We got only 6 - 8 hours in the day. chrs, Olive

StemBoostX 22 days ago

1

I dont want an invited user to have access to all my projects. This doesnt make sense as a use case. Much better to invite a user to a project. This would be so helpful

Christopher Powell 23 days ago

2

Summary It would be extremely valuable if the Automatic Backlinks feature could be restricted to building links only to pages contained within a user-specified sitemap or preferred URL list. Current Behaviour I've supplied a custom sitemap containing only the strategic pages I want to strengthen, but the Automatic Backlinks feature still appears to discover and build links to older blog posts elsewhere on the site. Why This Is a Problem Many websites contain legacy content that remains online for historical SEO value but is no longer part of the site's current strategy. For example, I have older blog articles that I intentionally keep indexed because they still carry backlinks and search equity. However, I don't want the Automatic Backlinks exchange continuing to strengthen those pages. Instead, I want all new backlinks to reinforce my current authority pages. Suggested Enhancement Please add an option to the Automatic Backlinks feature such as: Only build backlinks to URLs contained in the supplied sitemap Preferred backlink target URLs (user-managed list) Include/Exclude URL patterns (for example /blog/*, /archive/*, /2019/*) This would allow users to decide exactly which pages receive newly generated backlinks. Why This Would Benefit Users Many businesses have: Legacy blog content Archived resources Previous website versions Historical documentation Old articles kept solely for existing SEO equity Those pages should remain indexed by Google, but they are often not the pages site owners want to continue strengthening through the backlink exchange. Giving users control over backlink targets would allow authority to be concentrated on the pages that reflect their current products, services and brand positioning, while preserving the historical value of older content. I suspect this would be particularly valuable for agencies, established businesses and creators who have evolved their websites over time.

Peter Ashby Smith 23 days ago

4

For pretty much every generated set of headings no matter the article, the first H2 starts with the word “Understanding”. This shows a lack of thought and a very duplicated formulaic approach to heading language and it should be more robust/unique across articles. Please make generated article headings more unique, flexible and “smart”

Harrison Jordan about 2 months ago

3

Vasco told me to post my rant here about backlink exchange. If you have to reward me with links that are outside my niche, just prioritize .org links That’s for me Might not work that well for others DYOR Thanks!

Umair Sukhera 2 months ago

I use RankMath on my sites which already adds the Article schema, and it is better/more complete than the one Arvow injects. I don’t want 2 Article schemas on my posts, but you currently can’t disable this option. I still want the other schemas Arvow injects (FAQ, etc), and I’d prefer to keep RankMath’s article schema. Any way to do this?

Ben McCullough 3 months ago

2

I live in South Korea. Is it available in Korean as well?

저축왕윤농협 4 months ago

1

Allow the generated outline headings (ie H2, H3) to be draggable/movable so you can move their position before/after one another before generating the article.

Harrison Jordan 5 months ago

It would be nice to be able to delete keywords from the list suggested by the keyword feed. We sometimes end up with articles that don't meet our expectations because one or more of the keywords suggested by the AI are not relevant.

Fabienne Coly 5 months ago

Medium.com

Sam Ramaswami 5 months ago

1

Would be great if this would be automatically embedded in WP

Sam Ramaswami 5 months ago

1

Is this feature coming back? Why (not)?

Sam Ramaswami 5 months ago

1